Same event

  1. BGH Clarifies Controversial Questions on § 52 StPO: When Does the Right to Refuse Testimony End?
  2. Item did not need to be in possession at time of offense: BGH clarifies requirements for extended confiscation

Item did not need to be in possession at time of offense: BGH clarifies requirements for extended confiscation

By with∅ut-me 29.09.2026 at 12:36 Uhr Court Trials Laws & Rights
TL;DR AI-generated The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) has ruled that for the extended confiscation of proceeds of crime, the item in question does not need to have been in the defendant's possession at the time of the offense. This regulation aims for a complete recovery of unlawfully obtained assets.

Source: lto.de

0 votes

Same event

  1. BGH Clarifies Controversial Questions on § 52 StPO: When Does the Right to Refuse Testimony End?
  2. Item did not need to be in possession at time of offense: BGH clarifies requirements for extended confiscation

Discussion

Log in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Be the first!